Madelief Hageman vs Mercedes Aristegui Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 May at 09:14 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hageman vs M. Aristegui

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hageman 1 - 0 Aristegui
They have played 3 sets in total, with Madelief Hageman winning 2 and Mercedes Aristegui winning 1. The last match between Madelief Hageman and Mercedes Aristegui was at the W15 Kursumlijska Banja, 08-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Madelief Hageman getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hageman | 1 |
| Aristegui | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Kursumlijska Banja(05-08-25)
M. Hageman vs M. Aristegui H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.18% (137-136) | Career Total W/L | 46.22% (55-64) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Hageman vs M. Aristegui Match Preview:
- Aristegui has secured 31.94% of points on their second serve in recent matches, whereas Hageman has a higher percentage of 40.27%. Is second-serve performance a key determining factor? Yes, as it's a reliable match prediction indicator.
- When it comes to returning their opponent's second serve, Hageman slightly edges out Aristegui with 50.26% compared to 48.55%. How does this affect match favorability? Hageman may have a slight advantage.
- On first serve returns, Aristegui shows greater effectiveness with 39.43%, surpassing Hageman's 33.33%.
- Under pressure, Hageman has saved more breakpoints at 47.8% compared to Aristegui's 45.68%.
- In match performance over the last year, Aristegui outperforms Hageman with a win rate of 52.08% as opposed to Hageman's 42%.
- Both players thrive on clay courts, but Hageman holds a slightly better win percentage of 51% compared to Aristegui's 49%.
- At the Futures/ITF $10K level, Aristegui wins 59.46% of matches, a clear advantage over Hageman's 42.5%.
- Hageman has faced stronger competition with opponents averaging a rank of 353.82, compared to Aristegui's 406.83 average.
- In deciding sets, Aristegui is more successful, winning 62% of the time, while Hageman has a 50% success rate.
- Aristegui has a higher breakpoint conversion rate of 48.91% against Hageman's 44.55%.
Editorial Prediction (May 8, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match between Aristegui and Hageman presents an intriguing head-to-head, with both players showcasing notable strengths and aspects of vulnerability. Aristegui carries the edge over Hageman in overall match win rate and pressure situation performance, indicating resilience and an ability to handle critical moments effectively.
Hageman's superiority in second serve points and marginally stronger competition faced offers some competitive advantage. However, Aristegui's strengths in first serve returns and breakpoint conversion should not be overlooked, suggesting adaptability and skill in crucial situations.
Considering the overall blend of these performance factors, Aristegui appears to possess a slight advantage and is most likely to emerge victorious in this match.
Madelief Hageman vs Mercedes Aristegui Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hageman vs M. Aristegui H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 3:26:32 | Average Match Time | 3:26:32 |
| 76% (87/114) | 1st Serve % | 70% (57/82) |
| 54% (47/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 44% (12/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (7/21) |
| 57% (47/82) | Return Points Win % | 48% (55/114) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hageman Recent Matches Played
M. Aristegui Recent Matches Played

M. Hageman vs M. Aristegui Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.18% (137/136) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.22% (55/64) |
| 49.60% (312/317) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.76% (124/147) |
| 51.23% (2990/2846) | Games Win/Loss | 47.88% (1176/1280) |
| 40.00% (14/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.37% (27/30) |
| 51.74% (119/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.43% (26/30) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 185 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 557 | Total Double Faults | 236 |
| 1:20:31 | Average Match Time | 1:21:2 |
| 339.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.7 |
| 65% (8766/13465) | 1st Serve % | 73% (3948/5387) |
| 57% (4983/8766) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (2051/3948) |
| 44% (2067/4699) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (591/1439) |
| 49% (864/1760) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (370/760) |
| 47% (6283/13283) | Return Points Win % | 48% (2687/5653) |
| 37.50% (15/25) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (18/30) |
| 52.36% (122/111) | Futures W/L | 52.11% (37/34) |
| 50% (136/272) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (55/119) |
| 20% (9/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 54% (45/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (19/33) |
| 85% (134/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (52/45) |
| 15% (134/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (52/7) |
| 17% (139/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (67/10) |